Section 708(b)(3) protects a “record, the disclosure of which creates a reasonable likelihood of endangering the safety or the physical security of a building, public utility, resource, infrastructure, facility or information storage system, which may include: Recently, it is offered as a rationale by agencies in denying access requests for information related to elections, surveillance of state liquor stores, and levee certifications. This exemption is sparingly used, cited in just 301 appeals as of June 10, 2023. This one, Section 708(b)(3), centers on infrastructure and the legal analysis is provided by Appeals Officer Bandy Jarosz. Exemptions, Explained: 708(b)(3)Īnother “Exemptions, Explained” blog post, another security-related exemption. 2023-1213.Įducation records that are unable to be redacted of identifying information do not need to be disclosed under FERPA. 2023-1055.Īutopsy and toxicology records can be obtained from coroners and medical examiners upon the payment of a fee. Mugshots are not prohibited from disclosure, although they may contain other criminal history information not subject to release. 2023-0735.Īgencies may be required to obtain records from their cellular telephone providers. Internal deliberations among less than a quorum of school board members may be exempt from access. The OOR can determine the public status of election-related records but access to those records are subject to limitations found in the Election Code. 2023-1065.Ī request may lack sufficient specificity if it requires an agency to make judgments as to which records relate to the request’s subject matter. Employment applications of agency employees are public but certain information may be redacted from them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |